If you're new to using pull requests and just want to see what steps you should follow, here's my git pull request checklist which you may find helpful. What if you want to keep the branch around so you can always go back and see when it was merged? We'll get to that at the end of this post. You can create another branch, and even give it the same name, but don't recycle branches you've already associated with a pull request for use with any other work. Cool Tip: Delete remote and local Git branches easily Read More. But it is also possible to create a new Git branch and switch in this branch using only one git checkout command with -b option. git merge dev Updating 03c769c.b0147e6 Fast-forward index. After you have created a branch, you need to switch in this branch using a git checkout command. Once you are in the master branch, execute git merge dev as shown below to merge the dev branch with master. Reusing the patch-1 branch (after its original PR has been merged and closed) is a good way to cause problems in your git repository. To create a new branch there is a git branch command. At this point, the pull request is complete, and future commits should only be made on master, not patch-1. After the merge (assuming a new merge commit is added), both master and patch-1 point to a new merge commit. Before the merge, master and patch-1 both point to separate commits in git's commit history. Then when a bug occurs that needs to be applied to an old release, a new branch is made for that release based on the tagged version, the bug fix is made, merged, what have you, and then a new old version (point. and then merge their branches into the master so it can be used for release. Consider a scenario in which a branch patch-1 is about to be merged with the master branch through a pull request. Developers make branches to add features, fixes etc.
They don't add any significant technical overhead, but they make it more difficult for humans to work with lists of branches in the repository.īranches can be safely removed without risk of losing any changes. In most cases, branches, especially branches that were related to a pull request that has since been accepted, serve no purpose. Nevertheless Git kept claiming everything up-to-date. Later I wanted to move C and B away from Master to have create a situation like this: /-> C master -> B -> A. This was successfully pushed to the remote. Why should you delete old branches from your git repositories? There are two main reasons: I have rebased and stacked some branches (lets call them A, B, C) on top of master: master -> A -> B -> C. It's a common housekeeping practice to delete git branches once they're no longer used, but this practice isn't necessarily universal, or universally understood.
0 kommentar(er)
